Mid-term Evaluation
Mid-term Evaluation of the “R.O.O.M – Freedom of Expression in the 21st century” program.
Mid-term Evaluation of the “R.O.O.M – Freedom of Expression in the 21st century” program.
This Youth-led Social Accountability in ASRHR case study showcases AAAZ’s approaches and strategies in promoting meaningful youth participation in social accountability.
The GreenWorks Program aims to contribute to climate change mitigation efforts by creating sustainable economic opportunities for more than 9000 young women and men within the green economy in North Africa by the end of 2023.
Read about the work Hivos and its partners has done in 2020. The document also includes the Annual Accounts 2020.
This Executive Summary is part of the “Indigenous Peoples and Access to the Justice System in Maranhão” report.
The Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) utilizes the Strategic Litigation approach to promote and advance human rights and the rule of law in Southern Africa. With Support from Hivos, through the Regional Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR), SALC implemented a ‘Strategic litigation for social change for adolescent SRHR’ project.
This strategy is intended for developing Open Data Capacity (ODC) of selected Malawi Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) on the data supply side and selected Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) on the demand side in the open data generation, packaging, access and use.
This report, produced for the PROTECT program in Malawi, provides a picture of available data informing government’s decisions on the Covid-19 preparedness and response.
Hivos commissioned a study which sought to conduct an in-depth analysis of Covid-19 data in Malawi, which should provide disaggregated data as evidence base for response planning to Covid-19 by policy makers and other development partners.
Hivos, under the PROTECT Program, commissioned a study with the broad objective of unearthing the barriers and enablers to accessing the Covid-19 Government Open Access data.
This paper explores paths towards a deepened collaboration between open and sustainable procurement advocates and practitioners. Building on literature and key informant interviews, it outlines the two fields, their potential for mutual reinforcement and positive impact as well as possible tensions.