Document category: Main Publication

We have created a set of digital principles that explain our values and determine the digital tools and approaches used in our programs.

HIV and AIDS are not purely medical problems. They are development and human rights issues. This has been Hivos’ conviction since the early 1990s when we were one of the first development organizations to respond to the pandemic.

We interviewed seven future-oriented activists, artists and academics. We asked them, “How can we counter the digital monoculture?”

This white paper outlines the ambition, approach and Theory of Change of one of Hivos’ three impact areas: Gender Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.

This white paper outlines the ambition, approach and Theory of Change of one of Hivos’ three impact areas: Civic Rights in a Digital Age.

This white paper outlines the ambition, approach and Theory of Change of one of Hivos’ three impact areas: Climate Justice.

Hivos and Wageningen University have developed a new monitoring & evaluation (M&E) method for advocacy: “Narrative Assessment.” It centers on the creation of credible stories about advocacy processes, achievements and challenges.

Hivos has developed five strategies for promoting the voices and choices of marginalized people, while strengthening civil society overall. This primer is about the second strategy: forging multi-actor initiatives.

We find ourselves at a moment in time when the true extent of the challenges facing the world has been thrown into stark relief. Our Strategic Compass 2021 – 2024 ensures Hivos is well-equipped to address these challenges – together with our partners and allies.

Read about the work Hivos and its partners has done in 2020. The document also includes the Annual Accounts 2020.

If you are interested in shifting how people think about gender and sexuality – then this document is for you!

This reflection paper describes the experiences of the Citizen Agency Consortium with implementing a large multi-country evaluation of four programs. It takes stock of what worked and what didn’t work when evaluating the outcomes of a diverse set of lobby and advocacy strategies and activities.